Showing posts with label Robert Mugabe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert Mugabe. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 April 2013

THE DAWN OF THE END OF MDC-T


I read this article and found it to be so insightful that I had to post it in it’s entirety. More so the points presented are quite relevant and to a certain extent true….
Could this spell the end of the MDC?

BY SIMUKAI TINHU

Fourteen years ago, Zimbabwe’s main opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) launched itself onto Zimbabwe’s political scene with great local and international fanfare. The MDC was seen as having given rise to a new understanding of Zimbabwean politics, which sought to explain the vulnerability of President Mugabe’s Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU – PF). Not since independence from British rule in 1980, had an opposition party played such a significant role in the Southern African nation’s politics.
Indeed, for the first time ever, ZANU-PF went on to lose a majority in parliament, and its octogenarian leader was relegated to second place after being beaten by MDC’s Morgan Tsvangirai in the first round of the 2008 presidential elections. Many Zimbabweans predicted that the MDC juggernaut would sweep to victory in the elections, which have been scheduled to take place at the end of the coalition government (formed after the 2008 elections).

Based on the evidence of voter surveys (notably, Afrobarometer and Freedom House) and some not-so-well-attended MDC political rallies (in comparison to 2002 and 2008 election campaigns), a feeling has developed that the MDC may have indulged in undue optimism. Indeed, the words ‘MDC’ and ‘lose’ are being flung around liberally these days by both local and international analysts.
Why are Zimbabwean voters deserting the MDC?

One contention is that, whilst in government, MDC politicians have been caught up in corruption scandals, which has made some voters doubt the party’s ability to run the country differently from ZANU-PF. Another contention is that ZANU-PF’s populist policies, such as the campaign for the indigenisation of foreign owned companies, have won sympathy from many Zimbabweans, who being largely unemployed, have aspirations towards entrepreneurialism. The MDC’s opposition to this policy has also been propagandised by ZANU-PF as evidence that Tsvangirai’s party is against black empowerment.

In addition, the recently improved performance of the Zimbabwean economy, in comparison to the period prior to the formation of the coalition government in 2008, has been a double edged sword for the MDC. Tsvangirai’s party put forth the argument that with the Finance and Industry ministries in its hands, the party has successfully transformed the economy from an inflationary nightmare to one that has consistently recorded growth (following years of ZANU-PF’s mismanagement), and the land grab policy that destroyed the agriculture sector (formerly the backbone of the economy). However, restoring the economic fortunes of the country has meant the end of the worst food shortages and tackling of hyperinflation. This means that the previously successful message on the need to fix the economy holds less weight.

Lastly, it appears the opposition has been unable to guard against an attack on the person of their leader, Morgan Tsvangirai. ZANU-PF has successfully turned nasty rumours into political currency, damaging Tsvangirai’s political fortunes. For example, the antics of the MDC leader in bed and the caricature of him as indecisive have seen some of his ardent supporters doubting his sincerity and capacity to lead the country.
Even Core Voters deserting MDC
These explanations suggest reasons why Zimbabweans in general are deserting the MDC, but not its core supporters. The majority of the party’s votes have traditionally come from urban areas and the Matabeleland and Midlands regions. Why is it that the attitudes of voters from these areas have changed recently?
Unnoticed, within the last five years, there has been a development that has had a significant impact on Zimbabwe’s political landscape; the mushrooming of urban based Pentecostal churches that target young urbanites doing well economically, or those poor who aspire to do so. These groups have traditionally been the core of the MDC support. Whereas ten years ago, the MDC had the capacity to attract sixty thousand young urban dwellers to a political rally, today it is the Pentecostal church leaders who get the crowds.
Led by the likes of the charismatic Emmanuel Makandiwa and Hubert Angel, these churches have built a strong following of mostly young urbanites, would be MDC voters. One characteristic of the groups is apathy towards politics, particularly as a product of religious teachings, and also a disturbing tendency towards a sort of puritanism that politics cannot provide. These young born-again believers have a moral repulsion towards politicians, and it is not surprising that a promiscuous presidential aspirant will have little chance in winning their vote.
ZANU-PF has also seized on a heightened anti-western mood amongst the young to intensify its portrayal of Tsvangirai as a front for neo-colonialists. Buoyed by the ‘Africa Rising’ meta-narrative, this message appears to be resonating with mostly young and educated Africans, and Zimbabweans are no exception. Judging from the two most recent elections in Africa; Kenya and Zambia, where Uhuru Kenyatta and Michael Sata ran campaigns based on sustained anti-western rhetoric, the MDC might need to devise a strategy to guard itself against being portrayed as its stooges.

The MDC’s alienation of voters from the Mateleland and the Midlands regions appear to have been shaped by a number of factors. First, people from Matebeleland and the Midlands state that they are dissatisfied with the MDC’s failure to secure decentralisation of the state, both politically and constitutionally. Second, voters from these regions, who are predominantly Ndebele speaking, have accused Tsvangirai of not doing enough to ensure that the issue of Gukurahundi, where 2000 civilians were allegedly killed by the state, is resolved or at least kept in the limelight. Third, some of Tsvangirai’s personal behaviour, such as impregnating a 23 year old girl from Matebeleland, denying responsibility and later on admitting that he was the father, seems to have helped reverse inroads that the party had made in this constituency in the last 10 years.

Finally, the Matebeleland and Midlands regions have become targets of competition by the resurrected Zimbabwe African People’s Union (ZAPU-PF), a party that was once led by Joshua Nkomo before he was forced into a political union with ZANU-PF, and the smaller MDC formation led by Welshman Ncube, crowding the MDC in the process.

### END OF PART 1

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

New Constitution : So Near Yet So Far!!! "Are we there Yet?????"



His excellency the president, is likely to be the one to set the date for the general elections. This comes after the Supreme come court passed a ruling in favor of the president in the matter as to when the elections could be held in that the existing parliament would have to be dissolved on 29 June.

President Judge George Chiweshe passed the rulling saying that the existing parliament could not last beyond the 29th of June this year and he cited several reasons...

In his judgment delivered last week in favour of Mugabe, reasons were given yesterday, Justice Chiweshe said it was common cause that the President was sworn into office on June 29, 2009. Among them was the view that under the existing constitution, the life of the parliament will have come to an end.


“On that date,Parliament shall stand dissolved . . . It is, however, permissible to extend the life of Parliament beyond that date on the grounds provided under Section 63 (5) and (6) of the Constitution,” Chiweshe said.

So the President has the ultimate power on the deciding of the poll date. But there are other factors of influence. for instance when is the NEW CONSTITUTION be passed and adopted as the law in the country?

While the top brasses of the country debate and argue about the poll date and so on they are not explaining the new constitution situation as it still hold zimbabweans at ransom: - as tight as it has ever been.

Minister Chinamasa was on radio in the previous week explaining this among other issues of  particularly his visit to England with several other politicians.
Chinamasa explained that the new constitution has to first wait a probationary period of 30 days before it can be debated in parliament  and that it will the be passed as a bill and the adopted. 

The likely time frame to look at in my opinion is at least 3 months. In the meantime we have all this ruckus one poll dates.

Its confusing to the random pedestrian that after voting for a new constitution and still to be held at ransom by the old one. More information has to be given to the Zimbabweans...
Here they are happy about their new constitution but its still not in their reach. 
Classic So Near Yet So FAR!!!

What is wanted now is information...   and a clear road map to were the country is headed...